Farmers' Almanac forecasts frosty Great Lakes flip-flop

'It's going to get icy, it's going to get snowy'

In Michigan, January is expected to begin mild with rain and wet snow, followed by 2-5 inches of snow possible in a storm at the end of the month, according to this year's Farmers' Almanac forecast.

In Michigan, January is expected to begin mild with rain and wet snow, followed by 2-5 inches of snow possible in a storm at the end of the month, according to this year's Farmers' Almanac forecast.

Getty Images

After an unusually warm and stormy summer, the Great Lakes region has in store a “frosty flip-flop” winter, according to the 2021-22 Farmers’ Almanac forecast.

“By that, we mean one month it’s going to start out mild, and it’s going to get icy, it’s going to get snowy,” said Sandi Duncan, the publication’s managing editor. “It’s going be a mixed bag kind of winter.”

The month-to-month contrast follows an unusually stormy summer for the Great Lakes region, which the Almanac predicted to be “muggy and thundery” last April.

The buzzwords for the Great Lakes this winter are “icy and flaky,” the Almanac reports.

January is expected to begin mild with rain and wet snow, followed by 2-5 inches of snow possible in a storm at the end of the month, the publication predicts. February calls for bitter temperatures but little precipitation. March has been projected as snowy and stormy throughout the month.

What makes the Farmer’s Almanac so certain?

That’s hard to know. Its predictions do not include any type of computer satellite tracking or lore-based techniques, such as groundhogs, the publication reports. Its formula includes factors such as “sunspot activity, tidal action of the moon, the position of the planets and a variety of other factors.”

Atmospheric phenomena such as El Nino and La Nina were not factors in the forecast, Duncan said. “Some people are saying La Nina might come into play, but we didn’t have a chance to factor that in.”

While the Almanac’s website claims an 80-85% accuracy rate, meteorologists have always suggested taking the Farmers’ Almanac’s predictions with a grain of salt.

In 2017, meteorologist Jan Null compared the accuracy of the almanac’s temperature and precipitation predictions with the actual results. Forecasts were graded as good, not good or mixed, depending on if they were predicted the same as they were observed.

Of the 34 precipitation regions compared, Null rated 21% as “good.” She rated 42% of the 33 temperature regions as good.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration also releases a 90-day prediction forecast from its Climate Prediction Center. Unlike the Farmers’ Almanac, NOAA uses the most up-to-date technology and computer models.

“Covering December, January and February, we’re favoring only slightly above normal temperatures and above normal precipitation, which includes rain and snow for the Great Lakes,” NOAA meteorologist Brad Pugh said. “La Nina is currently present, and we expect La Nina to persist through the winter.”